Skip to page content or Skip to Accesskey List.


Main Page Content

Accusations Of Bias In Domain Dispute Resolution

Rated 3.89 (Ratings: 0)

Want more?

  • More articles in News
Picture of isaac


Member info

User since: 14 Dec 1998

Articles written: 67

Michael Geist and five students at the University of Ottawa Law School have examined a number of rulings from the ICANN-established Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), and found that the vast majority of rulings favour large, trademark-holding companies emerge victorious.

Success has come to these instigators in over 80% of the cases handled by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the National Arbitration Forum (NAF), who together process roughly 90% of disputes. The percentages are lower in the cases handled by two other arbitration organisations who handle the remaining cases, but still favour the complainants.

Geists analysis suggests that the ability of instigators to select their preferred arbitrator is having a significant bearing on outcomes.

The analysis is available for download in PDF format.

Further information is available at the following links:



Isaac is a designer from Adelaide, South Australia, where he has run Triplezero for almost a decade.

He was a member and administrator of since its founding in 1998, designed the current site, and was a regular contributor on's direction-setting discussion list, theforum.

On the side, he runs Opinion, Hoops SA, Confessions, Daily Male, and Comments, as well as maintaining a travel gallery at

The access keys for this page are: ALT (Control on a Mac) plus: is an all-volunteer resource for web developers made up of a discussion list, a browser archive, and member-submitted articles. This article is the property of its author, please do not redistribute or use elsewhere without checking with the author.